Monday, October 20, 2008

T. Boone Pickens, He's Our Man. If He Can't Do It...

It may be time for us all to familiarize ourselves with T. Boone Pickens' Energy Plan.  I bring this up, because with every passing day, it seems more and more likely that the government either won't have the money to invest in alternative energy, or will choose not to invest in alternative energy because it isn't top priority.  At a rally in Belton, MO yesterday, McCain contradicted himself  by saying that he would freeze government spending on all programs except defense, veterans care, Social Security, and health care, but later in the very same speech he said that if he is elected, the government will invest in all energy alternatives including nuclear, wind, solar, tide, and clean coal.  Of course he also emphasized that new oil drilling will begin immediately if he is elected president.  Obama has not specifically said that he will cut some of the money he proposed to spend on his energy plan, but he has been hedging, saying that he may need to delay some programs.  The dropping oil and gasoline prices also tend to lower the priority of alternative energy in the minds of some.

All this leads me to the point about T. Boone Pickens.  If indeed the government is not going to invest in alternative energy, then private investors may be the only way to go.  If you're not familiar with the Pickens Plan, it essentially includes two parts.  Part A includes a substantial investment in wind energy and the infrastructure required to harness the energy and get it to the electrical power grids.  Part B, and where his plan gets a little tricky, involves "freeing up" the natural gas currently used to power the electrical grid, made possible because in theory, the wind power will replace the natural gas power on the grid, and then using that natural gas in hybrid vehicles.  Most are in favor of the investment in wind energy.  Most are against the plan to use natural gas to power vehicles, for all the usual reasons.  Environmentally, it's not much better than gasoline.  

There are so many different ways the future of our energy may be headed.  The fact is that hybrid cars will be partially powered by electricity, but unless we have a fully electric car, they will still be dependent on some sort of fuel.  Will it be gasoline, natural gas, or ethanol, or some other biofuel?  T. Boone Pickens has a plan and he has money to back it.  If it goes his way, then natural gas is the answer.


**** UPDATE ****

It seems as if Mr. Pickens may have hit a bit of a roadblock, which may be related to tough economic times and the impact on the automotive industry.  T. Boone Pickens is the majority share holder of a company called Clean Energy Fuels, which is a natural gas vehicle distribution company.  Clean Energy Fuels was in negotiations with Honda to buy FuelMaker, one of their subsidiaries.  FuelMaker manufactures natural-gas refueling appliances, one of which is designed for consumers to use at home.  T. Boone was hoping to acquire FuelMaker in order to try to capitalize on the use of the in-home fueling device (Phill), which would alleviate the need to invest in infrastructure to equip gas stations with natural gas refueling capabilities.  Details as to why the deal fell through were not really provided, although it seems Honda was the initiator in terminating the agreement.  The termination was announced on October 16, 2008, and Clean Eenergy shares were trading at $9.44 which is down about 50% from September, when they were close to $20.  

4 comments:

Jane Doe said...

This blog definitely has a point about private investors. There is so much going on, and so much money being spent on war and all of the other unnecessary things the government dumps into, I think that private investors is the only way anything is going to get done to correct the way we use energy. I had never heard of Picken's before this blog. Is he a politician or just a wealthy man? And was that just a paraphrase of hi plan or is it way more in depth and thought out?

Energy4tomorrow said...

RESPONSE TO JANE DOE:

Thanks for your comment. I agree that it's looking more and more like private investors will have to step it up if alternative energy is going to become a major factor. To answer your questions re: T. Boone Pickens and his plan; Mr. Pickens is not a politician. He is a very wealthy man who made most of his money in oil. His plan is much more detailed than the summary I included on my blog. To find out more about his detailed plan and his personal bio, you can click on the link in the first paragraph.

Volt-Air said...

Its refreshing to read a plan that seems semi-environmentally and feasible. Boone's plan may still involve a greater usage of natural gas but it seems like the overall amount of CO2 pollution will stay about the same. Its too bad there aren't more groups trying to take advantage of both clean energy and our economy. Sure, its underhanded, but it helps.

Energy4tomorrow said...

RESPONSE TO VOLT-AIR:

I was interested in how you closed your comment by saying that it was underhanded to take advantage of alternative energy and our environment. I had the exact same thought when I started to look into The Pickens Plan. I was thinking there was something that wasn't right about a former oil tycoon switching to alternative energy. But the more I thought about it, I don't see a problem with making money off alternative energy. After all, it's a business like any other. If Mr. Pickens invests the money up front, he's taking a risk and may loose or profit depending on many variables. I do believe that energy is a money making proposition and I'm not sure there's a problem with it. When I compare it to something like the healthcare insurance companies making profits off of people's illnesses and in some cases profiting by denying treatment, then making money off energy seems completely legitimate. I'd love to hear back from you and continue the discussion.